In the Netherlands, a recent suggestion was made for the introduction of a civil remedy for apologies. Could this be seen as a plea for the revival of the action for amende honorable from early modern times? The latter remedy, aimed at retraction and apologies for insults and reputational injuries, had its roots in medieval Canon law and indigenous law. During the process of reception, it was shaped by moral-theological concepts and provided with Roman law elements. It was meant to undo the injury, not to punish the wrongdoer. The Dutch Civil Code of 1838 retained only a reminiscence of the old amende honorable, which was soon to disappear from legal practice. The current proposed claim would to some degree resemble the old remedy for amende honorable. Unlike the latter, however, it will be aimed at emotional recovery for some specific kinds of injury and not for defamation in general.

中文翻译：

---

道歉声明：复兴光荣？

在荷兰，最近有人建议引入民事道歉补救措施。这是否可以看作是对复兴早期近代光荣修正行动的请求？后一种补救措施旨在撤回并为侮辱和名誉损害道歉，其根源在于中世纪的佳能法和土著法。在接受过程中，它被道德神学概念所塑造，并被赋予了罗马法元素。它的目的是消除伤害，而不是惩罚违法者。1838 年的荷兰民法典只保留了旧的修正荣誉的回忆，很快就从法律实践中消失了。当前提议的索赔在某种程度上类似于修正光荣的旧补救措施。然而与后者不同的是，