当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Gerontol. Ser. B › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Social and Physical Context Moderates Older Adults’ Affective Responses to Sedentary Behavior: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B ( IF 6.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-24 , DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbab036
Derek J Hevel 1 , Eric S Drollette 1 , Genevieve F Dunton 2, 3 , Jaclyn P Maher 1
Affiliation  

Objectives Older adults engage in excessive sedentary behaviors which hold significant health implications. Examining affect responses during sedentary behavior is not well understood despite the wealth of evidence linking affect and motivation. Contextual influences (i.e., social and physical) likely influence affective responses during sedentary behavior and therefore warrant further investigation. Method Older adults (n = 103, Mage = 72, range: 60–98) participated in a 10-day study where they received 6 randomly timed, smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) prompts/day. Participants reported their affect, current behavior, and context at each EMA prompt. Participants also wore an activPAL accelerometer to measure their sedentary behavior duration. Separate multilevel models examined the extent to which the context influences affective responses during self-report sedentary (vs nonsedentary) behaviors. Results The social context moderated the association between sedentary behavior and negative affect. The physical context moderated the association between sedentary behavior and positive affect. Discussion Interventions should consider the context of behaviors when designing interventions to reduce sedentary behavior as some contextual factors may attenuate, while other contexts may exacerbate, associations between activity-related behaviors and indicators of well-being.

中文翻译:

社会和物理环境调节老年人对久坐行为的情感反应:一项生态瞬时评估研究

目标 老年人从事过度久坐的行为,这对健康有重大影响。尽管有大量证据将情感和动机联系起来,但在久坐行为期间检查情感反应尚不清楚。环境影响(即社会和身体)可能会影响久坐行为期间的情感反应,因此需要进一步调查。方法 老年人(n = 103,Mage = 72,范围:60-98)参加了一项为期 10 天的研究,他们每天收到 6 个随机定时、基于智能手机的生态瞬时评估 (EMA) 提示。参与者在每个 EMA 提示中报告了他们的影响、当前行为和背景。参与者还佩戴了一个 activPAL 加速度计来测量他们的久坐行为持续时间。单独的多级模型检查了在自我报告久坐(与非久坐)行为期间环境影响情感反应的程度。结果 社会背景调节了久坐行为和负面情绪之间的关联。物理环境调节了久坐行为和积极情绪之间的关联。讨论 在设计减少久坐行为的干预措施时,干预措施应考虑行为背景,因为一些背景因素可能会减弱,而其他背景可能会加剧活动相关行为与幸福感指标之间的关联。物理环境调节了久坐行为和积极情绪之间的关联。讨论 在设计减少久坐行为的干预措施时,干预措施应考虑行为背景,因为某些背景因素可能会减弱,而其他背景可能会加剧活动相关行为与幸福感指标之间的关联。物理环境调节了久坐行为和积极情绪之间的关联。讨论 在设计减少久坐行为的干预措施时,干预措施应考虑行为背景,因为一些背景因素可能会减弱,而其他背景可能会加剧活动相关行为与幸福感指标之间的关联。
更新日期:2021-02-24
down
wechat
bug