当前位置: X-MOL 学术Advances in Accounting › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Non-GAAP earnings disclosures around regulation G – The case of “implicit non-GAAP reporting”
Advances in Accounting Pub Date : 2019-09-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.adiac.2019.100432
Felix Thielemann , Tami Dinh

ABSTRACT We identify a phenomenon related to non-GAAP earnings disclosure and examine its prevalence around Regulation G (RegG). Specifically, we analyze to what extent firms only disclose adjustments to GAAP earnings instead of entire adjusted earnings figures thereby not providing the ideal non-GAAP to GAAP reconciliation promoted by RegG. We refer to this reporting behavior as “implicit non-GAAP reporting” and ask three different questions: How is “implicit non-GAAP reporting” related with the adoption of RegG? What type of firm reports implicit non-GAAP measures? What are the motives for “implicit non-GAAP reporting” post-RegG? Our analyses yield three key findings. First, the frequency of “implicit non-GAAP reporting” spikes after the regulatory intervention but to a lesser degree also existed before. Second, during the post-RegG time period, the prevalence of “implicit non-GAAP reporting” is much higher among firms who only started to report non-GAAP earnings after RegG was enacted (starters) than among those, which continued to disclose non-GAAP earnings across the regulatory intervention (continuers). Third, we show that only for starters, “implicit non-GAAP reporting” is associated with motives of beating analyst earnings forecasts as well as experiencing GAAP losses. Our study provides important insights for regulators, firms and academics into "implicit non-GAAP reporting" by examining properties and determinants of implicit vs. explicit non-GAAP earnings for different types of firms around RegG.

中文翻译:

围绕法规G的非GAAP收益披露–“隐式非GAAP报告”案例

摘要我们确定了与非GAAP收益披露相关的现象,并研究了其在法规G(RegG)周围的普遍性。具体而言,我们分析了企业仅在多大程度上披露了对GAAP收益的调整,而不披露整个调整后的收益数据,从而没有提供RegG推动的理想的非GAAP与GAAP对帐。我们将此报告行为称为“隐式非GAAP报告”,并提出三个不同的问题:“隐式非GAAP报告”与RegG的采用有何关系?哪种类型的公司报告隐含的非GAAP指标?RegG之后“隐式非GAAP报告”的动机是什么?我们的分析得出三个主要发现。首先,“隐性非GAAP报告”的频率在监管干预后达到峰值,但在较小程度上也曾存在。其次,在RegG后时期 在RegG颁布后才开始报告非GAAP收益的公司(初学者)中,“隐性非GAAP报告”的发生率要比在整个监管干预措施中继续披露非GAAP收益的公司(续)中的高得多。 。第三,我们表明,仅对于初学者而言,“隐式非GAAP报告”与击败分析师收益预测以及遭受GAAP亏损的动机有关。通过研究RegG周围不同类型公司的隐性和显式非GAAP收益的性质和决定因素,我们的研究为监管机构,公司和学者提供了关于“隐性非GAAP报告”的重要见解。在整个监管干预措施(续)中继续披露了非GAAP收入。第三,我们表明,仅对于初学者而言,“隐式非GAAP报告”与击败分析师收益预测以及遭受GAAP亏损的动机有关。通过研究RegG周围不同类型公司的隐性和显式非GAAP收益的性质和决定因素,我们的研究为监管机构,公司和学者提供了关于“隐性非GAAP报告”的重要见解。在整个监管干预措施(续)中继续披露了非GAAP收入。第三,我们表明,仅对于初学者而言,“隐式非GAAP报告”与击败分析师收益预测以及遭受GAAP亏损的动机有关。通过研究RegG周围不同类型公司的隐性和显式非GAAP收益的性质和决定因素,我们的研究为监管机构,公司和学者提供了关于“隐性非GAAP报告”的重要见解。
更新日期:2019-09-01
down
wechat
bug