当前位置: X-MOL 学术Analytic Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Basic Argument and Modest Moral Responsibility
Analytic Philosophy Pub Date : 2017-06-01 , DOI: 10.1111/phib.12095
D. Justin Coates 1
Affiliation  

1 To be morally responsible for her decision to x, an agent must be morally responsible for the state of mind that issues in x. 2 To be morally responsible for the state of mind that issues in x, an agent must be morally responsible for the decisions that caused her to have that state of mind. 3 To be morally responsible for those decisions, however, she would be to be morally responsible for the state of mind that issued in those decisions. 4 But if we keep tracing the etiology of the decision to x we will fail to find a state of mind for which the agent is not morally responsible only if an infinite regress of mental states is possible or the agent is causa sui. 5 An infinite regress of mental states is impossible. 6 No (human) agent is causa sui. 7 So, the agent is not morally responsible for x.

中文翻译:

基本论点和适度的道德责任

1 为了对她对 x 的决定负有道德责任,代理人必须对 x 中的心理状态负有道德责任。2 要对 x 中的心理状态负有道德责任,代理人必须对导致她有这种心理状态的决定负有道德责任。3 然而,要对这些决定负有道德责任,她就要对这些决定中所发出的心理状态负有道德责任。4 但是,如果我们继续将决定的病因追溯到 x,我们将无法找到一种心理状态,只有当心理状态有可能无限倒退或行为者是因果关系时,我们才会发现行为者不对其负有道德责任的心理状态。5 精神状态的无限倒退是不可能的。6 没有(人类)代理人是因果关系。7 因此,代理人在道德上不对 x 负责。
更新日期:2017-06-01
down
wechat
bug