Infectious diseases remain a threat to public health in today's interconnected world. There is an ongoing debate on how responses to threats of infectious diseases can best be coordinated, and the field remains nascent in understanding which specific structural governance arrangement will perform best. The present paper contributes to this discussion by demonstrating that it is possible to develop working hypotheses specifying the relationship between the type of infectious disease crisis and type of response to the crisis. For type of crises and type of response mechanisms there is still a lack of research, but the hypothesis combining these two provide a perspective for a future research and action agenda. It certainly prevents us from choosing between schism or hypes when it comes to crisis response. It provides instruments to realize that no single type of response is the most effective and that not all responses are equally effective in a concrete case.

中文翻译：

---

对传染病威胁的适当治理应对：发展工作假说

在当今相互联系的世界中，传染病仍然是对公共健康的威胁。关于如何最好地协调对传染病威胁的响应，目前正在进行辩论，并且该领域仍处于萌芽状态，以了解哪种特定的结构治理安排将发挥最佳作用。本文通过证明有可能发展出具体的工作假设来说明这种传染性危机的类型与对危机的反应之间的关系，从而为这一讨论做出了贡献。对于危机的类型和应对机制的类型，仍然缺乏研究，但是结合了这两种假设的假设为未来的研究和行动议程提供了一个视角。在应对危机时，这无疑使我们无法在分裂还是炒作之间做出选择。