Evolutionary debunking arguments in ethics aim to use facts about the evolutionary causes of ethical beliefs to undermine their justification. Global Evolutionary Debunking Arguments (GDAs) are arguments made in metaethics that aim to undermine the justification of all ethical beliefs. Local Evolutionary Debunking Arguments (LDAs) are arguments made in first‐order normative ethics that aim to undermine the justification of only some of our ethical beliefs. Guy Kahane, Regina Rini, Folke Tersman, and Katia Vavova argue for skepticism about the possibility of LDAs. They argue that LDAs cannot be successful because they over‐extend in a way that makes them self‐undermining and yield a form of moral skepticism. In this paper I argue that this skepticism about the possibility of LDAs is misplaced.

中文翻译：

---

本地进化的揭穿论点

伦理学中的进化论揭穿论证旨在利用关于伦理学信念的进化成因的事实来破坏其合理性。全球进化的揭穿论点（GDA）是在元伦理学中提出的论据，旨在破坏所有伦理信仰的正当性。局部进化的揭穿论点（LDA）是在一阶规范伦理学中提出的论据，旨在破坏我们仅某些伦理信仰的正当性。盖伊·卡哈内（Guy Kahane），里贾纳·里尼（Regina Rini），福尔克·特斯曼（Folke Tersman）和凯蒂亚·瓦沃娃（Katia Vavova）表示怀疑LDA的可能性。他们认为，LDA不能成功，因为它们过度扩张会导致自我破坏并产生一种道德怀疑主义。在本文中，我认为对LDA可能性的怀疑是错误的。