Vice epistemology is in the business of defining epistemic vice. One of the proposed requirements of epistemic vices is that they are reprehensible—blameworthy in a non‐voluntarist way. Our problem, as vice epistemologists, is giving an analysis of non‐voluntarist responsibility that will count just the right qualities, no more and no less, as epistemic vices. If our analysis of non‐voluntarist responsibility ends up being too narrow, then it risks excluding some qualities that we want to count as epistemic vices, such as implicit biases. Whereas, if it ends up being too broad, it risks including qualities that we do not want to count as epistemic vices, such as impaired vision. I recommend a three‐step program for vice epistemologists: 1. admit that we have a responsibility problem; 2. strive to define the responsibility problem; 3. work together with specialists in non‐voluntarist responsibility to solve the responsibility problem.

中文翻译：

---

副认识论有责任问题

副认识论是定义认识副的业务。拟议中的流行病习俗的要求之一是，这些罪名应受到谴责，以非自愿的方式应受谴责。作为副认识论者，我们的问题是对非自愿主义责任进行分析，而这种责任将只不过是正确的素质，就如认识论的罪恶一样。如果我们对非自愿责任的分析最终过于狭,，则可能会排除一些我们想算作认识不良的品质，例如隐性偏见。而如果它最终变得太宽泛，则可能会冒包括我们不想算作认知恶习的特质，例如视力受损。我建议副认识论者分三步走：1.承认我们有责任问题；2.努力确定责任问题；3。