For many philosophers, the Lying Test is a reliable instrument for collecting data in semantics. Michaelson argued that the Lying Test does not fall prey to the problem with ambiguity that limits the Cancellability Test of Gricean inspiration. I contend that Michaelson's argument in favor of the Lying Test overlooks two fundamental aspects of what determine the content of an utterance.

中文翻译：

---

内容的说谎测试、歧义和确定：内容的说谎和确定

对于许多哲学家来说，说谎测试是收集语义数据的可靠工具。迈克尔森认为，说谎测试不会成为限制格莱斯灵感可取消性测试的模糊性问题的牺牲品。我认为迈克尔森支持说谎测试的论点忽略了决定话语内容的两个基本方面。