The article examines the legislative and judicial tasks of Islamic jurists and how they carried it out in constitutional or general legal structure. While the Pakistani experiment was inspired by the Iranian model of jurists' involvement in legislatures, Egypt took a different path by not recognizing any official role for Islamic jurists with ambiguous recognition of Islamic jurisprudence. The legislative role could take the form of incorporating Islamic jurists into the legislature, establishing a committee partially made up of Islamic jurists, or handing over some legislative task to an Islamic jurisprudential institution. Despite the fact that Islamization was intended to respond to the people's requests, it employed autocratic and authoritarian mechanisms. The project attempted to replace the typical class of socially recognized jurists with appointed committees entrusted with Islamic codification. The experiment was challenged for its operation and its Islamicity but never introduced Shari'a courts or Islamic clerical legislation.

中文翻译：

---

乌拉玛在当代埃及的伊斯兰法律制定和审判中

本文探讨了伊斯兰法学家的立法和司法任务，以及他们在宪法或一般法律结构中的执行方式。巴基斯坦的实验受到伊朗法学家参与立法机构模式的启发，而埃及则采取了另一种方式，即不承认伊斯兰法学家对伊斯兰法学的模棱两可的正式作用。立法职能可以采取以下形式：将伊斯兰法学家纳入立法机构；建立由伊斯兰法学家部分组成的委员会；或将某些立法任务移交给伊斯兰法学机构。尽管伊斯兰化旨在回应人民的要求，但它采用了专制和专制的机制。该项目试图用委托伊斯兰编纂的任命委员会取代典型的社会公认法学家。该实验因其操作和伊斯兰性而受到挑战，但从未引入伊斯兰教法法院或伊斯兰文书法。