This article represents a diachronic corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of South Korean news reports on inter-Korean summits in 2000, 2007, and 2018. By examining similarities and differences between conservative and liberal newspaper corpora, the study identifies discursive shifts that took place between the first and second summit in accordance with developments and changes in inter-Korean relations. The comparative analysis indicates that a cluster of discursive changes in media attention and source diversity facilitates the recontextualisation of the peace talks into multilateral international negotiations on the Korean peninsula. The contrastive study reveals that discursive contests between newspapers reproduce ideological conflicts despite increased media coverage of diplomatic ceremony.

本文代表了历时性的语料库辅助批评性话语分析，分析了2000年，2007年和2018年韩国间峰会的韩国新闻报道。通过研究保守派和自由派报纸语料库之间的异同，该研究确定了在两次语料库之间发生的话语转换。根据朝韩关系的发展和变化举行了第一次和第二次首脑会议。比较分析表明，媒体关注度和来源多样性方面的一系列话语变化，促进了和谈重新融入到朝鲜半岛多边国际谈判中。对比研究表明，尽管媒体对外交仪式的报道越来越多，但报纸之间的话语竞赛仍在重现意识形态冲突。