当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Singap. J. Trop. Geogr.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Not just parenting in the field: Accompanied research and geographies of caring and responsibility
Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography ( IF 2.000 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-24 , DOI: 10.1111/sjtg.12359 Christine Gibb 1
Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography ( IF 2.000 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-24 , DOI: 10.1111/sjtg.12359 Christine Gibb 1
Affiliation
Writing in our research companions, with attention to the importance of care in our fieldwork practices, is a political act that challenges the ways geography is believed to be practised, or should be practised. Once sidelined to footnotes and acknowledgements, research companions such as family members and research assistants have increasingly been rendered visible and their contributions considered. Yet, researchers remain reluctant to disclose their accompanied research in scholarly writing. Given this reticence, I contend that, collectively, such accounts are political acts and not warts‐and‐all disclosures of knowledge production. They challenge disciplinary norms over whose and which contributions count, and what constitutes a professional identity. Drawing upon Lynn Staeheli's (1996) insights into the potential for activism by transgressing boundaries of doing private acts in public spaces, and public acts in private spaces, I argue that doing and writing about accompanied fieldwork is fieldwork activism that re‐centres and values a caring geography.
中文翻译:
不仅是该领域的育儿:关爱和责任感的伴随研究和地区
写在我们的研究伙伴在关注实地调查工作中护理的重要性时,是一项政治行为,它对人们认为或应该实践地理的方式提出了挑战。一旦被脚注和认可所淘汰,诸如家庭成员和研究助手之类的研究伙伴就变得越来越明显,并考虑了他们的贡献。然而,研究人员仍然不愿在学术著作中披露其伴随的研究。鉴于这种沉默,我认为,总体而言,这种说法是政治行为,而不是对知识生产的虚假披露。他们对纪律规范提出质疑,这些规范涉及哪些贡献,哪些贡献以及构成专业身份的内容。借鉴Lynn Staeheli'
更新日期:2021-02-24
中文翻译:
不仅是该领域的育儿:关爱和责任感的伴随研究和地区
写在我们的研究伙伴在关注实地调查工作中护理的重要性时,是一项政治行为,它对人们认为或应该实践地理的方式提出了挑战。一旦被脚注和认可所淘汰,诸如家庭成员和研究助手之类的研究伙伴就变得越来越明显,并考虑了他们的贡献。然而,研究人员仍然不愿在学术著作中披露其伴随的研究。鉴于这种沉默,我认为,总体而言,这种说法是政治行为,而不是对知识生产的虚假披露。他们对纪律规范提出质疑,这些规范涉及哪些贡献,哪些贡献以及构成专业身份的内容。借鉴Lynn Staeheli'