当前位置: X-MOL 学术Appl. Mathmat. Model. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Recycling channel selection and coordination in dual sales channel closed-loop supply chains
Applied Mathematical Modelling ( IF 5 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-25 , DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.02.022
Benrong Zheng , Jie Chu , Liang Jin

The implications of dual sales channels (direct and traditional retail channels) and closed-loop supply chains (CLSCs) have been well recognized in the literature and in practice. In this study, we explore the reverse channel choice for the manufacturer and the design of coordination mechanisms in CLSCs in the midst of dual competitive sales channels. We consider three recycling channel structures: manufacturer collecting (Model M), retailer collecting (Model R) and third-party collecting (Model C) structures. We present the following findings. The manufacturer and the retailer obtain more profits in Model M and Model R, respectively. However, from the perspective of the supply chain system, either the M model or the R model could be optimal depending on the following parameters: channel competition intensity between the direct and retail channels, collection costs and remanufacturing cost savings. Furthermore, we show that a simple price contract that consists of the wholesale price, direct channel price and transfer price of the used product (in Model R and Model C), with a complementary profit sharing mechanism can effectively coordinate dual-channel CLSCs under different recycling channel structures.



中文翻译:

双销售渠道闭环供应链中的回收渠道选择和协调

双重销售渠道(直接和传统零售渠道)和闭环供应链(CLSC)的含义已在文献和实践中得到充分认识。在这项研究中,我们探索了在双重竞争性销售渠道中,制造商的反向渠道选择以及CLSC中协调机制的设计。我们考虑了三种回收渠道结构:制造商回收(M型),零售商回收(R型)和第三方回收(C型)结构。我们提出以下发现。制造商和零售商分别在Model M和Model R中获得更多利润。但是,从供应链系统的角度来看,M模型或R模型可能是最佳选择,具体取决于以下参数:直接和零售渠道之间的渠道竞争强度,回收成本和再制造成本节省。此外,我们表明,由二手产品的批发价格,直接渠道价格和转让价格(在模型R和模型C中)组成的简单价格合同,具有互补的利润分享机制,可以有效地协调不同条件下的双渠道CLSC。回收渠道结构。

更新日期:2021-03-10
down
wechat
bug