The field of psychology has a long history of tracing the lineage of modern day psychologists back to their academic roots (Benjamin, Durkin, Link, Vestal, & Accord, 1992), and industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology is no exception (Culbertson, 2016). Why do we do it? Well, it is intriguing to see how our initial training may be linked back to some of the pioneers of our field. Perhaps it also represents how we are connected with one another—through our extended family relationships. But of course an academic family tree only reflects a portion of how we might be interconnected with one another—certainly our networks go much further than our dissertation chairs. Indeed, they might include our collaborators, coworkers and former coworkers, fellow former graduate students, and a host of people with whom we have connected at conferences or through other professional and personal relationships, and the composition of these networks, arguably, matters.

中文翻译：

---

我们如何做我们正在做的事情：IO 心理学中性别表征的网络机制

心理学领域在将现代心理学家的谱系追溯到他们的学术根源方面有着悠久的历史（Benjamin、Durkin、Link、Vestal 和 Accord，1992 年），工业和组织（IO）心理学也不例外（Culbertson， 2016）。为什么这样做呢？好吧，看看我们的初始培训如何与我们领域的一些先驱联系起来是很有趣的。也许它也代表了我们如何通过我们的大家庭关系相互联系。但当然，学术家谱只反映了我们如何相互联系的一部分——当然，我们的网络比我们的论文主席走得更远。事实上，他们可能包括我们的合作者、同事和以前的同事、以前的研究生，