Despite extensive discussion of the desirability of recognition of religious law in Europe in recent years and widespread agreement among commentators that the precondition for any such recognition must be respect for human rights, there has little detailed analysis of what this would entail. This article aims to redress that omission by a systematic discussion of the compatibility of various forms of religious adjudication with the European Convention on Human Rights. It first clarifies the conceptual confusion surrounding the relationship between state law and religious adjudication, especially where voluntary non-binding adjudication is concerned. It then applies the relevant Convention jurisprudence (drawing especially on the recent Grand Chamber decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Molla Sali v Greece) to identify two relevant tests of compatibility. These are, respectively, the adequacy of judicial scrutiny and voluntariness or consent.

中文翻译：

---

宗教审判与欧洲人权公约

尽管近年来在欧洲对承认宗教法的可取性进行了广泛的讨论，并且评论家们普遍同意任何此类承认的前提必须是尊重人权，但几乎没有详细分析这会带来什么。本文旨在通过系统讨论各种形式的宗教裁决与《欧洲人权公约》的兼容性来纠正这一疏漏。它首先澄清了围绕州法与宗教裁决之间关系的概念混淆，尤其是在涉及自愿性非约束性裁决时。然后，它应用相关的公约判例（特别是借鉴了欧洲人权法院最近在 Molla Sali 诉希腊案中的大法庭裁决）来确定两个相关的兼容性测试。这些分别是司法审查和自愿或同意的充分性。