Philosophical pragmatism has seen a revival within the sociological discourse. We bring three strands of this approach into direct dialogue with one another. Anglophone and German scholars have brought pragmatists such as George Herbert Mead back to the forefront of our understandings of social action. In a parallel development, scholars such as Alfred Schütz incorporated Husserlian phenomenology with American pragmatism, reinforcing a specific micro-interactionist model. In Francophone sociology, Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot challenged the hegemonic structuralist approach in the 1980s by developing their own pragmatic framework. In this synthetic review, we illustrate why this recent French pragmatic sociology adds interesting cultural, sociological, and psychological dimensions to the American pragmatic and to phenomenological lineages. We then show how these innovations provide a richer understanding of the interaction between individuals and institutions and a way to understand something American pragmatists and phenomenological sociologists often struggle to engage with: social conflict.

中文翻译：

---

法国社会学实用主义：美国实用主义和社会学现象学传统的继承者和创新者

哲学实用主义已经在社会学话语中复兴。我们将这种方法的三个方面引入彼此的直接对话中。英语国家和德国学者将乔治·赫伯特·米德 (George Herbert Mead) 等实用主义者带回了我们对社会行动理解的前沿。在平行发展中，阿尔弗雷德·舒茨 (Alfred Schütz) 等学者将胡塞尔的现象学与美国实用主义结合起来，强化了特定的微观互动主义模型。在法语国家社会学中，Luc Boltanski 和 Laurent Thévenot 通过发展自己的实用框架挑战了 1980 年代的霸权结构主义方法。在这篇综合评论中，我们说明了为什么最近的法国语用社会学为美国语用学和现象学谱系增加了有趣的文化、社会学和心理维度。