Stanley Hauerwas’s claim that Bonhoeffer had a “commitment to nonviolence” runs aground on Bonhoeffer’s own statements about peace, war, violence, and nonviolence. The fact that Hauerwas and others have asserted Bonhoeffer’s commitment to nonviolence despite abundant evidence to the contrary reveals a blind spot that develops from reading Bonhoeffer’s thinking in general and his statements about peace in particular as if they were part of an Anabaptist theological framework rather than his own Lutheran one. This article shows that Bonhoeffer’s understanding of peace as “concrete commandment” and “order of preservation” relies on Lutheran concepts and is articulated with explicit contrast to an Anabaptist account of peace. The interpretation developed here can account for the range of statements Bonhoeffer makes about peace, war, violence and nonviolence, many of which must be misconstrued or ignored to claim his “commitment to nonviolence.”

中文翻译：

---

朋霍费尔对非暴力的不承诺：对斯坦利·豪尔瓦斯的回应

斯坦利·豪尔瓦斯 (Stanley Hauerwas) 声称朋霍费尔 (Stanley Hauerwas) 声称“致力于非暴力”，这与朋霍费尔 (Stanley Hauerwas) 自己关于和平、战争、暴力和非暴力的声明相悖。尽管有大量相反的证据，但豪尔瓦斯和其他人仍坚持朋霍费尔对非暴力的承诺，这一事实揭示了一个盲点，这是从阅读朋霍费尔的一般思想和他对和平的特别论述中形成的，好像它们是再洗礼派神学框架的一部分，而不是他的自己的路德教之一。这篇文章表明，朋霍费尔将和平理解为“具体的诫命”和“保护秩序”依赖于路德教的概念，并与再洗礼派对和平的描述形成鲜明对比。这里展开的解释可以解释朋霍费尔关于和平、战争、