Kant’s practical philosophy, Rawls’s theory of justice and contemporary human rights thinking are landmarks in liberal discussions of justice. Each forms part of a powerful tradition of political thought, and although their substantive accounts of justice diverge at many points, they also overlap in substantial ways. This article focuses not on their substantive claims about justice, or about other ethical standards, but on their differing views of the questions to be addressed, on their proposed justifications for standards of justice, and on a limited range of questions about interpreting and institutionalizing those standards.

中文翻译：

---

自由正义：康德、罗尔斯和人权

康德的实践哲学、罗尔斯的正义理论和当代人权思想是自由主义正义讨论的里程碑。每一种都构成了强大的政治思想传统的一部分，尽管它们对正义的实质性描述在许多方面存在分歧，但它们也以实质性的方式重叠。本文的重点不是他们关于正义或其他道德标准的实质性主张，而是他们对正义的不同看法。问题待解决，根据他们的提议理由为了正义的标准，以及关于有限范围的关于口译和制度化那些标准。