当前位置: X-MOL 学术Kantian Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Moral Rationalism and Demandingness in Kant
Kantian Review Pub Date : 2018-08-21 , DOI: 10.1017/s1369415418000225
Marcel van Ackeren , Martin Sticker

We discuss Kant’s conception of moral rationalism from the viewpoint of recent debates, which have distinguished different forms of moral rationalism. We argue that Kant’s version, ‘silencing’, is different and stronger than currently held versions of moral rationalism and that it also differs from versions of silencing that contemporary thinkers advocate. We then discuss Kant’s version of silencing in the context of the moral demandingness debate and argue that silencing can make a perfect duty very demanding. However, it is important that whilst in cases of conflict between duty and personal happiness the normative standing of the latter is silenced, silencing does not require that agents do all they can in the case of imperfect duties. We finally indicate the kind of latitude imperfect duties allow for, according to Kant’s strong form of moral rationalism.

中文翻译:

康德的道德理性主义和要求性

我们从最近辩论的角度讨论康德的道德理性主义概念,这些辩论区分了不同形式的道德理性主义。我们认为,康德的“沉默”版本与当前持有的道德理性主义版本不同且更强大,并且也不同于当代思想家所倡导的沉默版本。然后,我们在道德要求辩论的背景下讨论康德的沉默版本,并认为沉默可以使完美的职责变得非常苛刻。然而,重要的是,虽然在职责与个人幸福发生冲突的情况下,后者的规范地位被沉默了,但沉默并不要求代理人在职责不完善的情况下尽其所能。我们最后指出了不完美职责所允许的那种纬度,
更新日期:2018-08-21
down
wechat
bug