当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Kantian Review
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reason’s Disunity with Itself: Comments on Adrian Moore on Kant’s Dialectic of Human Reason
Kantian Review Pub Date : 2016-10-25 , DOI: 10.1017/s1369415416000224 Edward Kanterian
Kantian Review Pub Date : 2016-10-25 , DOI: 10.1017/s1369415416000224 Edward Kanterian
Adrian Moore develops a helpful distinction between good and bad metaphysics. Employing this distinction, I argue, first, that some contemporary metaphysical theories might be ‘bad’, insofar as they employ, unreflectively, concepts akin to Kant’s Ideas of reason. Second, I investigate the difficulty Kant himself has with explaining our craving for bad metaphysics. Third, I raise some problems for Kant’s doctrine of ‘transcendental cognition’, which rests on the difficult assumption that Ideas have objective reality. I conclude that, while Kant has given us means to combat certain bad metaphysics, his own philosophy is not entirely free of it either.
中文翻译:
理性与自身的不统一:评阿德里安·摩尔对康德的人类理性辩证法
阿德里安·摩尔对好与坏的形而上学进行了有益的区分。运用这种区别,我首先认为,一些当代形而上学理论可能是“坏的”,因为它们不加反思地使用了类似于康德的理性理念的概念。其次,我调查了康德本人在解释我们对坏形而上学的渴望时遇到的困难。第三,我对康德的“先验认知”学说提出了一些问题,该学说建立在理念具有客观现实的困难假设之上。我的结论是,虽然康德给了我们对抗某些不良形而上学的方法,但他自己的哲学也并非完全没有它。
更新日期:2016-10-25
中文翻译:
理性与自身的不统一:评阿德里安·摩尔对康德的人类理性辩证法
阿德里安·摩尔对好与坏的形而上学进行了有益的区分。运用这种区别,我首先认为,一些当代形而上学理论可能是“坏的”,因为它们不加反思地使用了类似于康德的理性理念的概念。其次,我调查了康德本人在解释我们对坏形而上学的渴望时遇到的困难。第三,我对康德的“先验认知”学说提出了一些问题,该学说建立在理念具有客观现实的困难假设之上。我的结论是,虽然康德给了我们对抗某些不良形而上学的方法,但他自己的哲学也并非完全没有它。