Rule-Consequentialism faces ‘the problem of partial acceptance’: How should the ideal code be selected given the possibility that its rules may not be universally accepted? A new contender, ‘Calculated Rates’ Rule-Consequentialism claims to solve this problem. However, I argue that Calculated Rates merely relocates the partial acceptance question. Nevertheless, there is a significant lesson from this failure of Calculated Rates. Rule-Consequentialism's problem of partial acceptance is more helpfully understood as an instance of the broader problem of selecting the ideal code given various assumptions – assumptions about who will accept and comply with the rules, but also about how the rules will be taught and enforced, and how similar the future will be. Previous rich discussions about partial acceptance provide a taxonomy and groundwork for formulating the best version of Rule-Consequentialism.

中文翻译：

---

规则后果论的假设

规则后果主义面临“部分接受的问题”：在其规则可能不被普遍接受的情况下，应该如何选择理想的代码？一个新的竞争者，“计算利率”规则后果主义声称可以解决这个问题。但是，我认为计算费率只是重新定位了部分接受问题。然而，计算费率的失败给我们带来了重要的教训。规则后果主义的部分接受问题更有助于理解为在各种假设下选择理想代码的更广泛问题的一个实例——关于谁将接受和遵守规则的假设，以及关于如何教授和执行规则的假设，以及未来会有多相似。