The transition from Fordist manufacturing to the so-called knowledge economy confronts organized labor across the advanced market economies with a new and more difficult landscape. Many scholars have suggested that the future of egalitarian capitalism depends on forging new political coalitions that bridge the interests of workers in the “new” and “old” economies. This article explores current trajectories of change in Denmark and Sweden, two countries that are still seen as embodying a more egalitarian model of capitalism. The authors show that labor unions in these countries are pursuing two quite different strategies for achieving social solidarity—the Danish aimed at equality of opportunity and the Swedish aimed at equality of outcomes. The article examines the origins of these different strategic paths and explores the distinctive distributional outcomes they have produced. The conclusion draws out the broad lessons these cases hold for the choices currently confronting labor movements throughout the advanced industrial world.

中文翻译：

---

分歧的团结

从福特式制造业向所谓的知识经济的转变，使发达市场经济体中的有组织的劳动力面临着一个新的、更加困难的局面。许多学者认为，平等资本主义的未来取决于建立新的政治联盟，以弥合“新”和“旧”经济体中工人的利益。本文探讨了丹麦和瑞典当前的变革轨迹，这两个国家仍被视为体现了更加平等的资本主义模式。作者表明，这些国家的工会正在追求两种截然不同的战略来实现社会团结——丹麦的目标是机会平等，瑞典的目标是结果平等。本文考察了这些不同战略路径的起源，并探讨了它们产生的独特分配结果。结论为这些案例为当前在整个发达工业世界中的劳工运动所面临的选择提供了广泛的经验教训。