Mild ovarian stimulation has emerged as an alternative to conventional IVF with the advantages of being more patient-friendly and less expensive. Inadequate data on pregnancy outcomes and concerns about the cycle cancellation rate (CCR) have prevented mild, or low-dose, IVF from gaining wide acceptance.

中文翻译：

---

弱、正常和高反应者体外受精与常规卵巢刺激的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析

温和的卵巢刺激已成为传统体外受精的替代方案，其优点是对患者更友好且成本更低。妊娠结局数据不足以及对周期取消率 (CCR) 的担忧阻碍了轻度或低剂量 IVF 获得广泛接受。