当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Journal of the American Philosophical Association
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Epistemic Pluralism: From Systems to Stances
Journal of the American Philosophical Association Pub Date : 2019-01-30 , DOI: 10.1017/apa.2018.34 JONARDON GANERI
Journal of the American Philosophical Association Pub Date : 2019-01-30 , DOI: 10.1017/apa.2018.34 JONARDON GANERI
Drawing on insights from the epistemological work of the Jaina philosophers of classical India, I argue in defense of epistemic pluralism, the view that there are different but equally valid ways of knowing the world. The version of epistemic pluralism I defend is stance pluralism, a pluralism about epistemic stances or perspectives, understood to be policies or stratagems of knowing. I reject the view that the correct way to characterize epistemic pluralism is as consisting in a pluralism about epistemic systems.
中文翻译:
认知多元主义:从系统到立场
借鉴古典印度耆那教哲学家认识论著作的见解,我为认识多元论辩护,认为存在不同但同样有效的认识世界的方式。我所捍卫的认知多元主义版本是立场多元主义,一种关于认知立场或观点的多元主义,被理解为认知政策或策略。我反对这样一种观点,即刻画认知多元主义的正确方法在于认知系统的多元主义。
更新日期:2019-01-30
中文翻译:
认知多元主义:从系统到立场
借鉴古典印度耆那教哲学家认识论著作的见解,我为认识多元论辩护,认为存在不同但同样有效的认识世界的方式。我所捍卫的认知多元主义版本是立场多元主义,一种关于认知立场或观点的多元主义,被理解为认知政策或策略。我反对这样一种观点,即刻画认知多元主义的正确方法在于认知系统的多元主义。