当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Journal of Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Science, institutions, and values
European Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-09-21 , DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12579
C. Mantzavinos 1
Affiliation  

This paper articulates and defends three interconnected claims: firstly, that the debate on the role of values for science misses a crucial dimension, the institutional one; secondly, that institutions occupy the intermediate level between scientific activities and values and that they are to be systematically integrated into the analysis; thirdly, that the appraisal of the institutions of science with respect to values should be undertaken within the premises of a comparative approach rather than an ideal approach. Hence, I defend the view that the issue be framed in reference to the following question: “What kind of institutional rules should be in place in order for the scientific process to unfold in such a way that the values that we deem more important come to the fore?” Addressing this concern is equivalent to conducting a debate on institutions and their role for science.

中文翻译:

科学、制度和价值观

本文阐述并捍卫了三个相互关联的主张:第一,关于科学价值观作用的辩论错过了一个关键维度,即制度维度;第二,机构处于科学活动和价值之间的中间层,它们将被系统地整合到分析中;第三,应该在比较方法而不是理想方法的前提下对科学机构的价值观进行评估。因此,我捍卫以下观点:“应该制定什么样的制度规则才能使科学过程以我们认为更重要的价值观脱颖而出的方式展开?” 解决这个问题相当于就机构及其在科学中的作用进行辩论。
更新日期:2020-09-21
down
wechat
bug