Mental health-care clinicians report that they hold patients responsible for morally objectionable behaviour but at the same time consider blaming attitudes to be inappropriate. These practices present a conundrum for all Strawsonian theories of responsibility. In response to this conundrum, Pickard has proposed severing the Strawsonian connection between being responsible and being an appropriate target of blaming attitudes. In this article I will argue that her solution fails to explain the practices at stake and provide an alternative solution that uncovers an under-theorized stance we take towards those whose abilities are underdeveloped or compromised.

中文翻译：

---

培育立场：不责怪责任感

精神卫生保健临床医生报告说，他们让患者对道德上令人反感的行为负责，但同时认为责备态度是不恰当的。这些做法为所有斯特劳森责任理论提出了一个难题。为了解决这个难题，皮卡德提议切断斯特劳森式的责任感和成为责备态度的适当目标之间的联系。在本文中，我将争辩说，她的解决方案未能解释所涉及的实践，并提供了一种替代解决方案，揭示了我们对那些能力欠发达或受到损害的人所采取的理论不足的立场。