当前位置: X-MOL 学术Nineteenth-Century Music Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Bequest and a Legacy: Editing Anton Bruckner’s Music in ‘Later Times’
Nineteenth-Century Music Review Pub Date : 2018-06-26 , DOI: 10.1017/s1479409818000307
Paul Hawkshaw

The present study has been prepared on the occasion of the publication of theNew Anton Bruckner Collected Works Edition’s first volume, Thomas Röder’s score of the Linz version of the First Symphony. The article re-evaluates a fundamental precept of the oldGesamtausgabeof Robert Haas and Leopold Nowak – the supremacy of the readings in Bruckner’s autograph manuscripts over those in his first prints. It begins with a brief history of the “Bruckner-Streit” of the 1930s and 40s and a summary of more recent challenges to the Haas-Nowak policy. An overview of the composer’s relationship with the brothers Franz and Josef Schalk, who were responsible for the production of many of his early editions, demonstrates that they worked closely with him at first, but began to make alterations without consulting him towards the end of the 1880s. Distinguishing Bruckner from his editors in the Third, Fourth and Eighth Symphonies is difficult, if not impossible. From an editorial perspective, it is pointless because, in these scores, the composer accepted their suggestions and made them his own. Later publications are a different matter. The discussion leads inevitably to a re-examination of a clause in Bruckner’s will which exercised a controlling influence over the oldGesamtausgabeand remains a seminal factor in any editorial considerations regarding Bruckner. The article demonstrates that the composer never intended his will to have a bearing on post-mortem editorial issues or to dictate the hierarchy of versions of his pieces.

中文翻译:

遗产和遗产:在“后期”中编辑安东布鲁克纳的音乐

本研究报告是在出版之际编写的新安东布鲁克纳全集版的第一卷,Thomas Röder 的林茨版第一交响曲的总谱。这篇文章重新评估了旧的基本戒律格桑陶斯加贝罗伯特·哈斯 (Robert Haas) 和利奥波德·诺瓦克 (Leopold Nowak) 的作品——布鲁克纳亲笔签名手稿中的读数高于他的第一批印刷品中的读数。它首先简要介绍了 1930 年代和 40 年代的“布鲁克纳海峡”,并总结了最近对哈斯-诺瓦克政策的挑战。概述作曲家与弗朗茨和约瑟夫沙尔克兄弟的关系,他们负责制作他的许多早期版本,这表明他们最初与他密切合作,但在接近尾声时开始进行修改而没有咨询他1880 年代。将布鲁克纳与他在第三、第四和第八交响曲中的编辑区分开来是很困难的,如果不是不可能的话。从编辑的角度来看,这是没有意义的,因为在这些乐谱中,作曲家接受了他们的建议,并把它们变成了自己的。后来的出版物是另一回事。讨论不可避免地导致重新审查布鲁克纳遗嘱中的一个条款,该条款对旧格桑陶斯加贝并且仍然是有关布鲁克纳的任何编辑考虑的重要因素。这篇文章表明,作曲家从未打算让他的遗嘱对事后的编辑问题产生影响,或者决定他作品版本的层次结构。
更新日期:2018-06-26
down
wechat
bug