当前位置: X-MOL 学术Nineteenth-Century French Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Une écriture militante: La critique littéraire et la royauté dans le Journal des débats (1830–48)
Nineteenth-Century French Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-01 , DOI: 10.1353/ncf.2019.0008
Grégoire Franconie

Abstract:The literary critics Alfred-Auguste Cuvillier-Fleury (1802–87) and Jules Janin (1804–74) were enthusiastic Orleanists. The papers they wrote for the Journal des débats were activist writings in support of King Louis-Philippe under the July Monarchy. These texts are important illustrations of the connection between literary criticism and political involvement, when the “kings of criticism” were the critics of kings: dreaming up an original figure of royalty that was both mirror of the constitutional monarchy and projection of their political desire. The July regency was portrayed as the embodiment of the nation, as if it summarized all political experiments in the history of France. Through their attempts to royalize public opinion, the two critics confirmed that royalty reinvented itself during the century of revolutions. (In French)

中文翻译:

联合国民兵组织:《文学评论》和《法国刑法杂志》(1830-48年)

摘要:文学评论家阿尔弗雷德·奥古斯特·库维利埃·弗莱里(Alfred-Auguste Cuvillier-Fleury,1802-87)和朱尔斯·贾宁(Jules Janin,1804-74)是奥尔良主义者。他们为《刑法杂志》撰写的论文是支持国王君主制下路易·菲利普国王的激进主义者著作。当“批评之王”是国王的批评者时,这些文字是文学批评与政治参与之间联系的重要例证:梦见一个皇室贵族形象,既是君主立宪制的反映,又是其政治愿望的投射。七月摄政被描绘成国家的化身,好像它总结了法国历史上的所有政治实验。通过试图使公众舆论趋于皇家化,两位评论家证实,在革命的世纪中,皇室重新塑造了自己。(法文)
更新日期:2019-01-01
down
wechat
bug