Abstract:Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s The Statesman’s Manual distinguishes between symbol and allegory, and the distinction reveals what is at stake in Mansfield Park. Austen alludes to the country house tradition that empowers Edmund Burke’s counterrevolutionary rhetoric, but the persistence of allegory in the novel produces anti-Burkean insights. Mansfield Park also challenges Paul de Man’s famous reading of Coleridge: while de Man’s essay “The Rhetoric of Temporality” labors to discriminate between tropes, Austen sometimes blurs tropes and dramatizes the precariousness of a political order dependent on them. Yet de Man’s study of Romantic tropes sheds light on the non-realistic aspects of Austen’s novel.

中文翻译：

---

象征，寓言和简·奥斯丁的曼斯菲尔德公园

摘要：塞缪尔·泰勒·科尔里奇（Samuel Taylor Coleridge）的《政治家手册》将符号和寓言区分开，并且该区别揭示了曼斯菲尔德公园所面临的威胁。奥斯丁（Austen）暗示了乡村别墅的传统，赋予了埃德蒙·伯克（Edmund Burke）反革命修辞以力量，但是小说中寓言的持续存在产生了反伯克的见解。曼斯菲尔德公园（Mansfield Park）也挑战了保罗·德曼（Paul de Man）着名的科尔里奇（Coleridge）读物：曼德曼（De Man）的论文《时间的修辞》（The Rhetoric of Temporality）试图区分各种对立，奥斯丁有时模糊了对立，并戏剧化了依赖它们的政治秩序的不稳定。然而，德曼对浪漫主义比喻的研究揭示了奥斯丁小说的非现实性方面。