Abstract:Literary critics have long drawn extensively on continental theory, whereas they have taken little interest in analytic philosophy. At times, they have critiqued analytic philosophy as apolitical or pedantic. More often, they ignore its existence. Perhaps they have done so, in part, because its methods have been ill-suited to their projects. Throughout the past few decades, literary critics have often—if not always—embraced two intellectual activities: historical contextualization and political critique. Continental theorists, more than analytic philosophers, have specialized in the performance of those tasks. While continental theorists have tended to approach philosophical concepts like the “good” or the “just” with suspicion, as instruments of political interests, analytic philosophers have put aside those concepts’ historical status, opting instead to describe their contours with precision.

中文翻译：

---

再谈文学伦理学：阅读过程的一种分析方法

摘要：文学评论家长期以来一直在广泛地研究大陆理论，而对分析哲学却兴趣不大。有时，他们批评分析哲学是非政治性的或腐的。通常，他们会忽略它的存在。也许他们之所以这样做，部分是因为它的方法不适合他们的项目。在过去的几十年中，文学评论家经常（即使不是总是）拥护两种智力活动：历史语境化和政治批判。大陆理论家比分析哲学家更专注于完成这些任务。大陆理论家倾向于以怀疑的态度对待诸如“善”或“正义”之类的哲学概念，但作为政治利益的工具，分析哲学家却抛弃了这些概念的历史地位，