当前位置: X-MOL 学术New Literary History › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Audre Lorde, Theodor Adorno, and the Administered Word
New Literary History Pub Date : 2018-01-01 , DOI: 10.1353/nlh.2018.0023
Benjamin Mangrum

Abstract:This essay considers Audre Lorde’s work in and for the feminist magazine Chrysalis alongside Theodor Adorno’s late essays on culture and administration. By analyzing Chrysalis within the twentieth-century history of independent print media, and also by looking to Lorde’s conflict with the magazine, this essay argues that Chrysalis exhibits what Adorno calls an “administrative view” in its production of intellectual and cultural work. However, by reckoning with the institutional contexts of this work, Lorde’s poetry, essays, and editorial service presented a concerted and consistent criticism of administrated thought in feminist institutions. This episode in Lorde’s career, along with Adorno’s turn in his late work toward viewing administrators as agents for the dialectical “correction” of bureaucracies, each offer related but mutually interrogating points on the philosophical and cultural map of the 1960s and 1970s. In addition to helping us analyze the tensions between culture and administration—feminist poetry and its institutionality—this work by Adorno and Lorde also suggests how we as critics might conceive of our own institutional practices and academic contexts.

中文翻译:

奥德丽·洛德(Audre Lorde),西奥多·阿多诺(Theodor Adorno)和管理词

摘要:本文考虑了奥德丽·洛德(Audre Lorde)在女权主义杂志《蝶ry》(Chrysalis)中以及为之所做的工作,以及西奥多·阿多诺(Theodor Adorno)关于文化和行政管理的晚期论文。通过分析20世纪独立印刷媒体历史中的Ch,并着眼于Lorde与该杂志的冲突,这篇文章认为Ch在其知识和文化作品的生产中展现出Adorno所谓的“行政观点”。然而,通过考虑这项工作的制度背景,洛尔德的诗歌,散文和编辑服务对女性主义制度中的行政管理思想提出了一致而一致的批评。洛尔德职业生涯中的这一集,以及阿多诺(Adorno)在他后期的工作中转向将行政人员视为对官僚机构进行辩证性“纠正”的代理人,在1960年代和1970年代的哲学和文化地图上,每一个都提供了相关但相互质疑的观点。除了帮助我们分析文化与行政之间的紧张关系(女权主义诗歌及其制度化)外,阿多诺和洛德的这项工作还暗示了我们作为批评家可能会想到我们自己的制度实践和学术背景。
更新日期:2018-01-01
down
wechat
bug