当前位置: X-MOL 学术British Journal of American Legal Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Administrative Functions of Implementation and Adjudication Guided by Primacy of Fundamental Rights
British Journal of American Legal Studies Pub Date : 2017-12-29 , DOI: 10.1515/bjals-2017-0013
Ricardo Perlingeiro 1
Affiliation  

Abstract This article points out the bottlenecks in the systems of administrative adjudication in Latin America and suggests that the ineffectiveness should not be blamed entirely on the judicial system and judicial procedures. Rather, the Latin-American system of administrative justice should come to terms with its judicial system of general jurisdiction, gradually reducing the jurisdiction of courts over administrative disputes in favor of an administrative reform to ensure administrative functions of implementation and adjudication respecting the primacy of fundamental rights. The author concludes that it is necessary to think about a reform that leads public administrative authorities to act as an instrument for expressing the public interest rather than as end in itself or as an entity to protect self-serving, momentary political and financial interests that are not clearly bound by a duty to protect fundamental rights.

中文翻译:

基本权利至上的执行和审判行政职能

摘要本文指出了拉丁美洲行政审判制度的瓶颈,并指出,无效性不应完全归咎于司法制度和司法程序。相反,拉丁美洲的行政司法制度应与其一般管辖权的司法制度相适应,逐步减少法院对行政纠纷的管辖权,以便进行行政改革,以确保尊重基本原则的执行和裁决的行政职能。权利。作者得出的结论是,有必要考虑一项改革,该改革促使公共行政当局充当表达公共利益的工具,而不是最终目的本身或作为保护自我服务的实体,
更新日期:2017-12-29
down
wechat
bug