This essay demonstrates Ibn Taymiyya’s engagement of historiography in iftāʼ. It draws upon fatwās on pilgrimage to Ascalon, travel to shrines of al-Ḥusayn in Ascalon and Cairo, and visits to Jerusalem and Hebron. Ibn Taymiyya weaves sophisticated historical narratives into his legal reasoning against visiting tombs of prophets and Ahl al-Bayt. He exposes lacunas, contradictions and unreasonable assertions in truisms about bodies of prophets and saints and their cults. He argues against ziyāra to such sites, blaming Shīʿīs for spreading the innovation at a particularly vulnerable time for Islam. His attack on notions of the religious merits of Jerusalem and of murābaṭa hinges upon his reconstruction of the history the Dome of the Rock and of the Islamic frontier. History leads him to stress the temporality of territorial definitions and their dependence on context. His argumentation resonates in works of later writers, demonstrating the continuing relevance of his fatwās.

中文翻译：

---

为穆夫提服务的史学：伊本·泰米亚 (Ibn Taymiyya) 关于 Ziyārāt 的起源和谬误

本文展示了伊本·泰米亚 (Ibn Taymiyya) 在 iftāʼ 中对史学的参与。它借鉴了阿斯卡隆朝圣的教令，前往阿斯卡隆和开罗的 al-Ḥusayn 圣地，以及参观耶路撒冷和希伯伦。Ibn Taymiyya 将复杂的历史叙述编织到他反对参观先知和 Ahl al-Bayt 坟墓的法律推理中。他揭露了关于先知和圣人的身体及其邪教的老生常谈中的漏洞、矛盾和不合理的断言。他反对 ziyāra 访问此类网站，并指责 Shīʿī 在伊斯兰教特别脆弱的时期传播创新。他对耶路撒冷和 murābaṭa 宗教价值观念的攻击取决于他对圆顶清真寺和伊斯兰边界历史的重建。历史使他强调领土定义的时间性及其对上下文的依赖。他的论证在后来作家的作品中引起了共鸣，证明了他的教令的持续相关性。