当前位置: X-MOL 学术Islamic Law and Society › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Principles of Hadith Criticism in the Writings of al-Shāfiʿī and Muslim

Islamic Law and Society Pub Date : 2017-10-03 , DOI: 10.1163/15685195-00244p01
Belal Abu-Alabbas 1
Affiliation  

Modern research by Muslim and early European scholars takes it for granted that Hadith criticism as documented by classical textbooks of muṣṭalaḥ al-ḥadīth represents how early Hadith criticism worked. In this essay I examine the standards of Hadith criticism established by two prominent scholars whose writings are the earliest known extant works on the theories of Hadith criticism, Muḥammad b. Idrīs al-Shāfiʿī (d. 204/820) and Muslim b. al-Ḥajjāj al-Naysābūrī (d. 261/875). In doing so, I determine the extent to which Hadith criticism as defined by Muslim is consistent with the system outlined by al-Shāfiʿī. A comparison of their works reveals that there is little difference between al-Shāfiʿī and Muslim on the principles of Hadith criticism, despite differences in their respective frameworks and agendas. Early Hadith critics appear to have adhered to a consistent system of criticism that likely developed in the generation before al-Shāfiʿī.

中文翻译:

al-Shafiʿī 和穆斯林著作中的圣训批评原则


穆斯林和早期欧洲学者的现代研究理所当然地认为,muṣṭalaḥ al-ḥadīth 的经典教科书所记载的圣训批评代表了早期圣训批评的运作方式。在这篇文章中,我考察了两位著名学者建立的圣训批评标准,他们的著作是现存最早的关于圣训批评理论的著作,穆罕默德 b. Idrīs al-Shafiʿī (d. 204/820) 和穆斯林 b. al-Ḥajjāj al-Naysābūrī(卒于 261​​/875)。在这样做时,我确定穆斯林定义的圣训批评在多大程度上与 al-Shafiʿī 概述的系统一致。对他们作品的比较表明,尽管他们各自的框架和议程存在差异,但沙菲伊和穆斯林在圣训批评的原则上几乎没有区别。
更新日期:2017-10-03
down
wechat
bug