The adoption of weak remedies, such as declarations or recommendations by the Bangladesh Supreme Court in litigations on state-induced forced slum evictions, significantly contributes to the tardy implementation of court orders. In this context, there is a growing global consensus on the structural injunction—a remedy that enables judges to monitor and bring about governmental compliance with judicial orders of social rights litigation. The Bangladesh Supreme Court faces several real and compelling challenges relating to its constitutional authority and institutional capacity that hinder remedial innovation. Through examining relevant constitutional provisions, judicial approach, and comparative examples, this article argues that the court has the capacity to overcome these constraints. Thus, it advocates judicial reform in Bangladesh to offset the state’s often arbitrary interference with the basic necessity of housing of the slum dwellers.

中文翻译：

---

孟加拉国强迫贫民窟搬迁的司法补救措施：结构禁令分析

采用弱补救措施，例如孟加拉国最高法院在关于国家引发的强迫贫民窟搬迁诉讼中的声明或建议，大大助长了法院命令的延迟执行。在这种情况下，全球对结构性禁令越来越达成共识——一种使法官能够监督并促使政府遵守社会权利诉讼司法命令的补救措施。孟加拉国最高法院面临着与其宪法权威和阻碍补救创新的制度能力有关的几个真实而令人信服的挑战。本文通过对相关宪法规定、司法方法和比较示例的考察，认为法院有能力克服这些限制。因此，