The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR—Council of Europe 2001) has fundamentally impacted language teaching and assessment in Europe (Figueras 2012; Barni 2015) and across the globe (Byram and Parmenter 2012). But the world has changed since its publication, and the internet has transformed communication. And so, for this reason and others, the CEFR has been updated and expanded with the Companion Volume (CV). In this contribution, we gauge the CV’s merits by the degree to which it takes into account fundamental criticism to the CEFR. We argue that the CV incorporates comments on the CEFR that suit its original purpose but largely disregards fundamental criticism. As such, the CV continues along the lines of the CEFR, for better and for worse.

中文翻译：

---

CEFR同伴卷：在基于研究的政策与基于政策的研究之间

《欧洲通用语言参考框架》（CEFR，欧洲理事会，2001年）已从根本上影响了欧洲（Figueras，2012年； Barni，2015年）以及全球（Byram和Parmenter，2012年）的语言教学和评估。但是自发布以来，世界已经发生了变化，互联网也改变了交流方式。因此，由于这个原因和其他原因，CEFR已随同伴卷（CV）进行了更新和扩展。在此贡献中，我们通过考虑对CEFR的基本批评程度来评估CV的优劣。我们认为，简历包含了对CEFR的评论，这些评论符合其最初的目的，但在很大程度上忽略了基本的批评。这样一来，CV沿用了CEFR的原则，不管是好是坏。