This article provides a critical reading of the judgments of The Hague District Court and especially The Hague Court of Appeal in the case of Mothers of Srebrenica v. the State of the Netherlands, which concerned the liability in tort of the Dutch State for facilitating the massacre of Bosnian Muslims in 1995. It engages with the courts’ considerations regarding the attribution of conduct to the State in UN peacekeeping operations, the extraterritorial application of human rights treaties, the State obligation to prevent genocide, and the State’s liability for damages. While not fully agreeing with the courts’ argumentation, the author concludes that the judgments contribute to the refinement of the law and practice of State responsibility in respect of wrongful acts committed in complex multinational peace operations.

中文翻译：

---

维和人员助长侵犯人权行为：荷兰国家在斯雷布雷尼察母亲案中的责任

本文对海牙地区法院，尤其是海牙上诉法院在斯雷布雷尼察的母亲诉荷兰国一案中的判决进行了批判性解读，这些判决涉及荷兰国家为促成大屠杀而承担的侵权责任1995 年波斯尼亚穆斯林的调查。它涉及法院对联合国维和行动中行为归属于国家的考虑、人权条约的域​​外适用、国家防止种族灭绝的义务以及国家的损害赔偿责任。提交人虽然不完全同意法院的论点，但得出的结论是，这些判决有助于完善关于复杂多国和平行动中所犯不法行为的国家责任的法律和实践。