The Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire case is the first time that an ITLOS ad hoc chamber has addressed the lawfulness of unilateral hydrocarbon activities in a disputed maritime area. This paper analyzes the Chamber's ruling on Côte d'Ivoire's submission no. 2, which covers several important issues: the jurisdiction of the Chamber to decide on submission no. 2, the alleged violation of sovereign rights, and the alleged violation of Article 83(3) of UNCLOS. The paper argues that the Chamber's jurisdictional basis of forum prorogatum is questionable, and that there are inconsistent approaches between the Judgment and the Order of the provisional measures. Additionally, there are not only inconsistent understandings of the “Ivorian maritime area” within the same submission no. 2 by the Chamber, but also a logical gap in the Chamber's reasoning with regard to submission no. 2(iii). Consequently, the Chamber's inconsistent approaches may jeopardize the persuasiveness of its judgment.

中文翻译：

---

加纳/科特迪瓦奇案：争议地区碳氢化合物活动的一致方法？

这加纳/科特迪瓦此案是国际海洋法法庭特设分庭首次处理有争议海域单方面碳氢化合物活动的合法性。本文分析分庭对科特迪瓦诉状的裁决。2，其中涉及几个重要问题：分庭的管辖权，以决定提交没有。2、涉嫌侵犯主权权利，涉嫌违反《联合国海洋法公约》第83条第3款。该文件认为，该分庭的管辖权基础论坛会议是有问题的，并且判决和临时措施的命令之间存在不一致的方法。此外，在同一份呈文中，不仅对“科特迪瓦海域”的理解不一致。2 由分庭提出，但在分庭关于第 2 号意见的推理中也存在逻辑缺陷。2(iii)。因此，分庭不一致的做法可能会损害其判决的说服力。