当前位置: X-MOL 学术Conflict Resolution Quarterly › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The US-EU Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Should It Leave a Door Open for Non-Legal Arbitrators?
Conflict Resolution Quarterly Pub Date : 2016-06-30 , DOI: 10.1002/crq.21172
Katia Fach Gómez 1
Affiliation  

This article reflects on the suitability of including non-legal arbitrators in certain investment arbitrations. It presents different mechanisms that have been used in the investment arbitration context to aid legal arbitrators with scientific-technical issues and contemplates the drawbacks of this external competence. After analyzing various sectors in which non-legal experts provide internal competence (international inspection boards, specialized national courts, commercial arbitration tribunals, and inter-state arbitration tribunals), the article concludes that incorporating arbitrators with scientific-technical competence into international investment tribunals on an ad casum basis may not be such a farfetched idea. Finally, several lege ferenda proposals that would achieve the common goal of not barring non-legal “judges” from the future US-EU Investment Court are put forward.

中文翻译:

美欧跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴关系:是否应该为非法律仲裁员敞开大门?

本文反映了在某些投资仲裁中包括非法律仲裁员的适宜性。它介绍了在投资仲裁环境中使用的不同机制,以帮助法律仲裁员解决科学技术问题,并考虑了这种外部能力的缺点。在分析了非法律专家提供内部权限的各个领域(国际检查委员会、专门的国家法院、商事仲裁庭和国家间仲裁庭)后,文章得出结论,将具有科学技术能力的仲裁员纳入国际投资法庭临时依据可能不是一个牵强附会的想法。最后,
更新日期:2016-06-30
down
wechat
bug