当前位置: X-MOL 学术Criminal Law Forum › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Brexit and Eu Criminal Law – The Norwegian Approach
Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2017-05-15 , DOI: 10.1007/s10609-017-9311-1
Annika Suominen

Norway is not a Member State of the EU. Its main connection to the EU is the Agreement on the European Economic Area (the “EEA Agreement”). Norway is also part of the Schengen Agreement. These agreements do not regulate Norway’s participation in EU criminal law, nor is Norway involved in the judicial cooperation in criminal matters regulated in Art. 82–86 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“TFEU”). If Norway wants to apply an EU criminal law instrument, there are two possibilities. Norway can conclude agreements tying it to a specific instrument regulating cooperation in criminal matters (such as the European Arrest Warrant) or to an EU criminal law institution (such as Eurojust). Norway can further support EU criminal law legislation, either politically or by aligning its own legislation in accordance with relevant EU criminal law legislation (such as a directive regulating either substantive criminal law or minimum procedural rights). This means that for each mutual recognition instrument a new agreement has to be made with the EU, and that each EU criminal law instrument needs to be taken into account separately. This rather pragmatic approach is therefore not very suitable for a post-Brexit UK. Before analysing the different approaches, the paper will touch upon some general tendencies relevant to the further analysis. Finally, concluding remarks sum up the important aspects and make some suggestions in relation to the UK’s position

中文翻译:

英国脱欧和欧盟刑法——挪威的方法

挪威不是欧盟成员国。它与欧盟的主要联系是欧洲经济区协议(“欧洲经济区协议”)。挪威也是申根协定的一部分。这些协议不规范挪威对欧盟刑法的参与,也不规范挪威参与第 1 条规定的刑事事项的司法合作。《欧盟运作条约》(“TFEU”)第 82-86 条。如果挪威想要适用欧盟刑法文书,有两种可能性。挪威可以缔结协议,将其与规范刑事事项合作的特定文书(例如欧洲逮捕令)或欧盟刑法机构(例如欧洲司法机构)联系起来。挪威可以进一步支持欧盟刑法立法,根据相关的欧盟刑法立法(例如规范实体刑法或最低程序权利的指令)在政治上或通过调整自己的立法。这意味着对于每项相互承认文书都必须与欧盟达成一项新协议,并且需要单独考虑每项欧盟刑法文书。因此,这种相当务实的方法不太适合脱欧后的英国。在分析不同的方法之前,本文将涉及一些与进一步分析相关的一般趋势。最后,结束语总结了重要方面,并就英国的立场提出了一些建议。这意味着对于每项相互承认文书都必须与欧盟达成一项新协议,并且需要单独考虑每项欧盟刑法文书。因此,这种相当务实的方法不太适合脱欧后的英国。在分析不同的方法之前,本文将涉及一些与进一步分析相关的一般趋势。最后,结束语总结了重要方面,并就英国的立场提出了一些建议。这意味着对于每项相互承认文书都必须与欧盟达成一项新协议,并且需要单独考虑每项欧盟刑法文书。因此,这种相当务实的方法不太适合脱欧后的英国。在分析不同的方法之前,本文将涉及一些与进一步分析相关的一般趋势。最后,结束语总结了重要方面,并就英国的立场提出了一些建议。本文将涉及与进一步分析相关的一些普遍趋势。最后,结束语总结了重要方面,并就英国的立场提出了一些建议。本文将涉及与进一步分析相关的一些普遍趋势。最后,结束语总结了重要方面,并就英国的立场提出了一些建议。
更新日期:2017-05-15
down
wechat
bug