The article focusses on the crime of sexual slavery in the ICC Statute. It examines the legal definition of enslavement in Article 7 (2) (c) ICC Statute and the Elements of Crimes (EOC) of enslavement and sexual slavery as well as the jurisprudence of the SCSL which was the first to deal with the application of the EOC of sexual slavery to a concrete situation (so-called ‘forced marriage’ phenomenon). The author questions whether there is a necessity to have two crimes against humanity of enslavement and sexual slavery but on the other hand, no war crime of enslavement. Further, she rejects the interpretation that human trafficking has become part of the definition of slavery/enslavement as the footnote in the EOC seems to suggest. The author argues vigorously that the phenomenon of ‘forced marriage’ should be prosecuted as sexual slavery and not under the residual offence of inhumane acts as a ‘new’ international crime.

中文翻译：

---

性奴役：除了奴役，我们还需要这种罪行吗？

这篇文章的重点是《国际刑事法院规约》中的性奴役罪行。它审查了《国际刑事法院规约》第 7 条第 (2) 款 (c) 项中奴役的法律定义和奴役和性奴役的犯罪要件 (EOC) 以及第一个处理适用EOC 性奴役的具体情况（所谓的“强迫婚姻”现象）。笔者质疑是否有必要犯奴役和性奴役这两种危害人类罪，而另一方面又没有奴役战争罪。此外，她拒绝将人口贩卖成为奴隶制/奴役定义的一部分的解释，正如 EOC 中的脚注所暗示的那样。