当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Journal of Law in Context › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Sen, justice and the private realm of dispute resolution
International Journal of Law in Context ( IF 1.170 ) Pub Date : 2017-12-20 , DOI: 10.1017/s1744552317000325
Debbie De Girolamo

The attainment of justice through a private dispute-resolution process, such as the mediation process, is an elusive objective. With the prominent place mediation has been given in civil justice, debates about the ability of mediation to deliver substantive justice are relevant, particularly when proponents of the process argue that mediation offers some form of justice to its participants, while critics argue that it provides no justice. This paper explores the issue of justice in the private dispute-resolution process of mediation and its ability to deliver a substantive form of justice (rather than procedural or popular justice, which is often seen as the type of justice, if any, that is provided by mediation). It does so through an analysis of ethnographic data of the mediation process using Amartya Sen's justice framework set out inThe Idea of Justice.

中文翻译:

森,正义和争议解决的私人领域

通过调解程序等私人纠纷解决程序实现正义是一个难以实现的目标。由于调解在民事司法中占有突出地位,关于调解能否实现实质性正义的辩论是相关的,特别是当该程序的支持者认为调解为其参与者提供了某种形式的正义,而批评者认为它没有提供任何形式的正义时正义。本文探讨了调解的私人争议解决过程中的正义问题及其提供实质性正义形式的能力(而不是通常被视为提供的正义类型(如果有的话)的程序正义或大众正义)通过调解)。它通过使用阿马蒂亚·森 (Amartya Sen) 在正义理念.
更新日期:2017-12-20
down
wechat
bug