The paper compares the involvement of four regional economic courts in legal disputes mirroring constitutional, political and social crises at national or regional levels. These four judicial bodies of the EU, the Andean Community, the East African Community and the Central American Integration System have all faced varied forms of resistance to their involvement and their general authority. By comparing these four case-studies from across the globe, the paper identifies institutional and contextual factors that explain the uneven resistance. While the regional economic courts in Central America and East Africa were subject to backlash from the Member States, their counterparts in Europe and Latin America avoided backlash but at the price of achieving only a narrow authority.

中文翻译：

---

国际裁决的局限：危机时期区域经济法院的权威与抵抗

本文比较了四个地区经济法院在反映国家或地区层面的宪法、政治和社会危机的法律纠纷中的参与情况。欧盟、安第斯共同体、东非共同体和中美洲一体化体系这四个司法机构都面临着对其参与和普遍权威的不同形式的抵制。通过比较来自全球的这四个案例研究，本文确定了解释不平衡阻力的制度和背景因素。虽然中美洲和东非的区域经济法院受到成员国的强烈反对，但欧洲和拉丁美洲的同行却避免了强烈反对，但代价是获得了有限的权威。