当前位置: X-MOL 学术Biosci. Rep. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A meta-analysis reveals the effectiveness of probiotics and prebiotics against respiratory viral infection.
Bioscience Reports ( IF 4 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-19 , DOI: 10.1042/bsr20203638
Fangyan Wang 1, 2 , Binhui Pan 3 , Sheng Xu 3 , Zhihua Xu 3 , Tiaotiao Zhang 3 , Qihao Zhang 1, 2 , Yifan Bao 1, 2 , Yingwei Wang 1, 2 , Jiamin Zhang 1, 2 , Changlong Xu 3 , Xiangyang Xue 2, 4
Affiliation  

Experimental experience suggests that probiotics and prebiotics (representative microbial agents) play a critical role in defending against respiratory virus infection. We aim to systematically examine these agents' effect on respiratory viral infection. An electronic literature search was conducted from published data with a combination of a microbial agents search component containing synonyms for microbial agents-related terms and a customized search component for respiratory virus infection. Hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR) and standard deviation (SD) were employed as effect estimates. In 45 preclinical studies, the mortality rates decreased in the respiratory viral infection models that included prebiotics or prebiotics as interventions (HR, 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.87; p = 0.002). There was a significant decrease in viral load due to improved gut microbiota (SD, -1.22; 95% CI -1.50- -0.94; p < 0.001). Concentrations of IFN-α (SD, 1.05; 95% CI 0.33-1.77; p = 0.004), IFN-γ (SD, 0.83; 95% CI 0.01-1.65; p = 0.05) and IL-12 (SD, 2.42; 95% CI 0.32-4.52; p = 0.02), IL-1β (SD, 0.01; 95% CI -0.37-0.40; p = 0.94) increased, whereas those of TNF-α (SD, -0.58; 95% CI -1.59 to 0.43; p = 0.26) and IL-6 (SD, -0.59; 95% CI -1.24- 0.07; p = 0.08) decreased. Six clinical studies had lower symptom scores (SD, -0.09; 95% CI -0.44-0.26; p = 0.61) and less incidence of infection (RR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.64-1.01; p = 0.06). Our research indicates that probiotics and prebiotics pose a defensive possibility on respiratory viral infection and may encourage the clinical application.

中文翻译:

一项荟萃分析揭示了益生菌和益生元对呼吸道病毒感染的有效性。

实验经验表明,益生菌和益生元(代表性微生物制剂)在防御呼吸道病毒感染方面发挥着关键作用。我们的目标是系统地检查这些药物对呼吸道病毒感染的影响。使用包含微生物病原体相关术语同义词的微生物病原体搜索组件和呼吸道病毒感染的定制搜索组件的组合,从已发表的数据中进行电子文献搜索。危险比(HR)、风险比(RR)和标准差(SD)被用作效果估计。在 45 项临床前研究中,包括益生元或益生元作为干预措施的呼吸道病毒感染模型的死亡率降低(HR,0.70;95% CI 0.56-0.87;p = 0.002)。由于肠道微生物群的改善,病毒载量显着降低(SD,-1.22;95% CI -1.50- -0.94;p < 0.001)。IFN-α (SD, 1.05; 95% CI 0.33-1.77; p = 0.004)、IFN-γ (SD, 0.83; 95% CI 0.01-1.65; p = 0.05) 和 IL-12 (SD, 2.42; 95% CI 0.32-4.52;p = 0.02),IL-1β(SD,0.01;95% CI -0.37-0.40;p = 0.94)增加,而 TNF-α(SD,-0.58;95% CI - 1.59 至 0.43;p = 0.26)和 IL-6(SD,-0.59;95% CI -1.24-0.07;p = 0.08)降低。六项临床研究的症状评分较低(SD,-0.09;95% CI -0.44-0.26;p = 0.61),感染发生率较低(RR,0.80;95% CI 0.64-1.01;p = 0.06)。我们的研究表明,益生菌和益生元对呼吸道病毒感染可能具有防御作用,并可能鼓励临床应用。IFN-α (SD, 1.05; 95% CI 0.33-1.77; p = 0.004)、IFN-γ (SD, 0.83; 95% CI 0.01-1.65; p = 0.05) 和 IL-12 (SD, 2.42; 95% CI 0.32-4.52;p = 0.02),IL-1β(SD,0.01;95% CI -0.37-0.40;p = 0.94)增加,而 TNF-α(SD,-0.58;95% CI - 1.59 至 0.43;p = 0.26)和 IL-6(SD,-0.59;95% CI -1.24-0.07;p = 0.08)降低。六项临床研究的症状评分较低(SD,-0.09;95% CI -0.44-0.26;p = 0.61),感染发生率较低(RR,0.80;95% CI 0.64-1.01;p = 0.06)。我们的研究表明,益生菌和益生元对呼吸道病毒感染可能具有防御作用,并可能鼓励临床应用。IFN-α (SD, 1.05; 95% CI 0.33-1.77; p = 0.004)、IFN-γ (SD, 0.83; 95% CI 0.01-1.65; p = 0.05) 和 IL-12 (SD, 2.42; 95% CI 0.32-4.52;p = 0.02),IL-1β(SD,0.01;95% CI -0.37-0.40;p = 0.94)增加,而 TNF-α(SD,-0.58;95% CI - 1.59 至 0.43;p = 0.26)和 IL-6(SD,-0.59;95% CI -1.24-0.07;p = 0.08)降低。六项临床研究的症状评分较低(SD,-0.09;95% CI -0.44-0.26;p = 0.61),感染发生率较低(RR,0.80;95% CI 0.64-1.01;p = 0.06)。我们的研究表明,益生菌和益生元对呼吸道病毒感染可能具有防御作用,并可能鼓励临床应用。94) 增加,而 TNF-α (SD, -0.58; 95% CI -1.59 to 0.43; p = 0.26) 和 IL-6 (SD, -0.59; 95% CI -1.24- 0.07; p = 0.08)减少了。六项临床研究的症状评分较低(SD,-0.09;95% CI -0.44-0.26;p = 0.61),感染发生率较低(RR,0.80;95% CI 0.64-1.01;p = 0.06)。我们的研究表明,益生菌和益生元对呼吸道病毒感染可能具有防御作用,并可能鼓励临床应用。94) 增加,而 TNF-α (SD, -0.58; 95% CI -1.59 to 0.43; p = 0.26) 和 IL-6 (SD, -0.59; 95% CI -1.24- 0.07; p = 0.08)减少了。六项临床研究的症状评分较低(SD,-0.09;95% CI -0.44-0.26;p = 0.61),感染发生率较低(RR,0.80;95% CI 0.64-1.01;p = 0.06)。我们的研究表明,益生菌和益生元对呼吸道病毒感染可能具有防御作用,并可能鼓励临床应用。
更新日期:2021-02-22
down
wechat
bug