In “The Limits of Critique and the Affordances of Form: Literary Studies after the Hermeneutics of Suspicion,” Winfried Fluck helpfully questions the “value assumptions and tacit normative principles” underlying Caroline Levine’s Forms (2015) and Rita Felski’s The Limits of Critique (2015). As Fluck notes, discussions of these books have mainly focused on “how convincing these approaches are as new methods of interpretation” (231). Instead, through detailing Felski’s and Levine’s investments in freeing the reader toward new attachments and affects (Felski) and foregrounding the collisions of literary and social forms (Levine), Fluck identifies a shared principle across these projects:

中文翻译：

---

在文学辩论的熔炉中竞赛

在“批评的局限性和形式的可供性：怀疑诠释学之后的文学研究”中，温弗里德·弗拉克对卡罗琳·莱文的形式（2015 年）和丽塔·费尔斯基（Rita Felski）的批评的局限性（2015 年）背后的“价值假设和默认规范原则”提出了有益的质疑）。正如 Fluck 所指出的，对这些书籍的讨论主要集中在“这些方法作为新的解释方法有多么令人信服”（231）。相反，通过详细介绍 Felski 和 Levine 在让读者释放新的依恋和影响（Felski）以及突出文学和社会形式的碰撞（Levine）方面的投资，Fluck 确定了这些项目的共同原则：