This article analyses the role of supranational human rights bodies in the implementation of their orders and recommendations in individual cases. It elicits the means, roles and impact of supranational mechanisms in triggering implementation processes by looking at the practice of UN treaty bodies and the three regional systems, through the in-depth study of specific cases and semi-structured interviews with relevant stakeholders. The article argues that supranational bodies are doing more than monitoring implementation of orders and recommendations in individual cases despite the scarcity of resources. They use different tools, both persuasive and coercive. Dialogue is central to their work, a dialogue that at times is opened to other actors such as civil society organizations, national human rights institutions and others. However, supranational bodies could do more to enhance the role they have promoting implementation by states of their orders and recommendations.

中文翻译：

---

监督、哄骗和促进对话：超国家人权机构在执行个人决定方面的作用是什么？

本文分析了超国家人权机构在个别案件中执行其命令和建议方面的作用。它通过对具体案例的深入研究和与相关利益相关者的半结构化访谈，通过审视联合国条约机构和三个区域系统的实践，引出超国家机制在触发实施过程中的手段、作用和影响。文章认为，尽管资源稀缺，但超国家机构所做的不仅仅是监督个别案件中命令和建议的执行情况。他们使用不同的工具，有说服力的也有强制力的。对话是他们工作的核心，这种对话有时对民间社会组织、国家人权机构等其他行为者开放。然而，