In this article, I examine the relation of religious language and public debate within the context of postsecularism and defend a falsificationist model. I argue that the postsecular public sphere ought to problematize four characteristics of modern thinking; the exclusion of truth and religious language, the asymmetry between religious and secular language, the essentialization of the secular and the religious and, lastly, the exclusivity and exhaustiveness of the secular and religious as categories. Based on these four problematizations, I defend a falsificationist model for the admission of religious language in the public sphere and argue that we ought to allow citizens the right to use the language of their choice in the public sphere, provided that they also provide in their preferred language ‘conditions of falsifiability’, that is, those circumstances upon which the speaking party would accept their argumentation as void.

在本文中，我研究了后世俗主义背景下宗教语言与公众辩论的关系，并捍卫了证伪主义模型。我认为，世俗后的公共领域应该对现代思维的四个特征提出质疑。排除真理和宗教语言，宗教和世俗语言之间的不对称，世俗和宗教的本质化，最后是世俗和宗教作为类别的排他性和穷举性。基于这四个问题，我捍卫了在公共领域承认宗教语言的伪造主义模型，并主张我们应该允许公民有权在公共领域使用他们选择的语言，但前提是他们也要在自己的语言环境中提供首选语言“可证伪性条件”，即