Border procedures have so far received little attention in the legal literature dealing with European asylum law. And perhaps even more conspicuously, the expanding body of literature on immigration detention in Europe has also neglected the use of detention in border procedures. That is remarkable, because one of the reasons that Member States resort to border procedures in order to process claims for international protection by third-country nationals, can be traced back to the centrality of territorial presence within the modern state for the enjoyment of rights. Moreover, the triangular relationship between an application for international protection, refusal of entry, and a deprivation of liberty has remained imprecise in legal regulation and case law; glossed over in policy-making; and under-explored in scholarship. This indeterminacy has had important repercussions for the way in which the right to liberty has been protected at the borders of Europe. However, the way in which the recast Procedures Directive circumscribes Member States’ use of this procedure is unprecedented (although it still raises many questions), and may tell us something about the way in which European integration in this area signals a further transition in the traditional assemblage of territory, authority and rights. This article uses the Dutch implementation of the Procedures Directive in order to unpack the above mentioned triangular relationship between an application for international protection, refusal of entry, and a deprivation of liberty. It will show that EU regulation in this area is distinctive because it entails recognition of the fact that, when it comes to the enforcement of migration control, individual rights are at stake.

中文翻译：

---

领土、程序和权利：欧洲庇护法中的边境程序

迄今为止，在处理欧洲庇护法的法律文献中，边境程序很少受到关注。也许更引人注目的是，不断扩大的关于欧洲移民拘留的文献也忽视了在边境程序中使用拘留。这很了不起，因为成员国诉诸边境程序以处理第三国国民的国际保护索赔的原因之一，可以追溯到现代国家领土存在的中心地位，以享受权利。此外，在法律规定和判例法中，申请国际保护、拒绝入境和剥夺自由之间的三角关系仍然不准确；在政策制定中被掩盖；并且在奖学金方面探索不足。这种不确定性对欧洲边界保护自由权的方式产生了重要影响。然而，重新制定的程序指令限制成员国使用该程序的方式是史无前例的（尽管它仍然提出了许多问题），并且可以告诉我们一些关于欧洲一体化在该领域标志着欧盟进一步转型的方式。领土、权威和权利的传统组合。本文使用荷兰对程序指令的实施，以解开上述国际保护申请、拒绝入境和剥夺自由之间的三角关系。它将表明欧盟在该领域的监管是与众不同的，因为它需要承认以下事实：