当前位置: X-MOL 学术Performance Improvement Quarterly › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Where the Performance Issues Are and Are Not: A Meta-Analytic Examination
Performance Improvement Quarterly Pub Date : 2016-04-01 , DOI: 10.1002/piq.21213
David Hartt , Tim Quiram , James A. Marken

The purpose of this study was to examine the often touted but rarely quantified claims of where performance problems actually occur in organizations. Starting in the mid–20th century, organizational development and performance consultants have followed the belief that the vast majority of organizational problems (85%) are tied to variables controlled by the organization and only a small percentage (15%) of performance problems are attributed to the worker. This study is a meta-analysis that examined 327 performance technology (PT) analysis projects and coded the recommendations according to PT models to quantify the ratio between organizational and individual performance recommendations and corresponding problems. We find broad support for the conventional wisdom regarding the ratio of organizational issues to individual workers.

中文翻译:

性能问题在哪里和不在哪里:元分析检查

这项研究的目的是检查经常被吹捧但很少量化的关于组织中实际发生绩效问题的说法。从 20 世纪中叶开始,组织发展和绩效顾问相信绝大多数组织问题 (85%) 与组织控制的变量有关,只有一小部分 (15%) 的绩效问题归因于给工人。本研究是一项荟萃分析,检查了 327 个绩效技术 (PT) 分析项目,并根据 PT 模型对建议进行了编码,以量化组织和个人绩效建议与相应问题之间的比率。我们发现有关组织问题与个体工人比例的传统观点得到广泛支持。
更新日期:2016-04-01
down
wechat
bug