当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Early Childhood Research › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A comparative analysis of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale–Revised and Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale, Third Edition
Journal of Early Childhood Research Pub Date : 2019-09-25 , DOI: 10.1177/1476718x19873015
Jennifer Neitzel , Diane Early 1 , John Sideris 2 , Doré LaForrett 1 , Michael B Abel 3 , Margaret Soli 4 , Dawn L Davidson , Amanda Haboush-Deloye 5 , Linda L Hestenes 6 , Denise Jenson 7 , Cindy Johnson 8 , Jennifer Kalas 9 , Angela Mamrak 10 , Marie L Masterson 3 , Sharon U Mims 6 , Patti Oya 8 , Bobbi Philson , Megan Showalter 10 , Mallory Warner-Richter 4 , Jill Kortright Wood 10
Affiliation  

The Early Childhood Environment Rating Scales, including the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale–Revised (Harms et al., 2005) and the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale, Third Edition (Harms et al., 2015) are the most widely used observational assessments in early childhood learning environments. The most recent version of the scale addresses some of the criticisms in the research literature, particularly related to the organization of the Scale and the standard scoring procedures. In the current study, we explore the relationship between the two scales. Specifically, we evaluated the correlations between the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale–Revised and the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale, Third Edition, as well as the differences between the overall scores, individual items, and subscales. Implications for practice and future research are also provided.

中文翻译:

修订后的《幼儿环境等级量表》和《幼儿环境等级量表》第三版的比较分析

幼儿环境等级量表,包括修订后的幼儿环境等级量表(Harms等,2005年)和幼儿环境等级量表第三版(Harms等,2015年)是美国使用最广泛的观察性评估。幼儿学习环境。该量表的最新版本解决了研究文献中的一些批评,特别是与量表的组织和标准评分程序有关。在当前的研究中,我们探讨了两个量表之间的关系。具体来说,我们评估了修订后的《幼儿环境等级量表》与《幼儿环境等级量表》(第三版)之间的相关性,以及整体评分,单个项目和子量表之间的差异。
更新日期:2019-09-25
down
wechat
bug