当前位置: X-MOL 学术Population Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Color of LGB: Racial and Ethnic Variations in Conceptualizations of Sexual Minority Status
Population Review Pub Date : 2017-01-01 , DOI: 10.1353/prv.2017.0002
Hua-Yu Sebastian Cherng

Abstract: Recently, demographic research on sexual minorities using large-scale surveys has flourished. Yet, there has been little attention paid to whether common survey measures of sexuality – and the use of these measures – capture important racial/ethnic and sex differences, despite evidence suggesting the existence of racial and ethnic differences in how sexuality is both understood and described. This paper focuses on the intersection of race/ethnicity, sex and sexuality, and asks whether the racial/ethnic compositions of populations are sensitive to definitions of non-heterosexual populations, and whether measures of sexuality change over time, racial/ethnic group and sex. Results show that different definitions of non-heterosexual populations influence estimates of racial/ethnic compositions of groups, and that patterns of identification across age cohorts and time also vary by race/ethnicity and sex. Using different theoretical perspectives, the paper concludes with recommendations of how non-heterosexual populations should be conceptualized in future research using large-scale surveys.

中文翻译:

LGB 的颜色:性少数地位概念化中的种族和民族差异

摘要:最近,使用大规模调查对性少数群体的人口统计研究蓬勃发展。然而,尽管有证据表明在如何理解和描述性行为方面存在种族和民族差异,但很少有人关注性行为的常见调查措施——以及这些措施的使用——是否能够捕捉到重要的种族/族裔和性别差异。 . 本文关注种族/民族、性别和性的交叉点,并询问人口的种族/民族构成是否对非异性恋人群的定义敏感,以及性的衡量标准是否随时间、种族/民族和性别而变化. 结果表明,对非异性恋人群的不同定义会影响对群体种族/民族构成的估计,跨年龄组和时间的认同模式也因种族/民族和性别而异。使用不同的理论观点,本文最后提出了在未来的研究中应如何使用大规模调查对非异性恋人群进行概念化的建议。
更新日期:2017-01-01
down
wechat
bug